I made an error there, that is true.
So with our 1dollar (100 cents) aspirin.
If it is 10% less, it costs 90cents.
50% less it is 50cents.
90% less it costs 10 cents.
100% less it costs zero.
So, Trump is claiming more than 100% price cuts. He is claiming it will cost less than nothing to buy aspirins or whatever.
it is this simple i will try one last time to explain
if it costs me 10 cents to produce an aspirin and i want to make 1000% profit i would need to sell that aspirin at 0.1 * 1000/100 = 0.1 * 10 = 1 dollar. see how we multiplied by 1000% there? therefore i can reduce the price of that aspirin by 1000% ie 1 dollar / 1000/100 ie 100/1000 = 0.1 so im not paying anyone im just not making a profit im selling it at cost.
as everyone knows there is a big profit to be made in pharmaceuticals but joe public doesnt know exactly how much is on an aspirin and where the money goes ie how much to the drug company how much to the hospital… how much to the sales rep etc etc
Rather than saying these drug companies are making x% and the hospitals are making y% etc etc which would cause the yanks to have a melt down and start rushing around boycotting the companies or hospitals etc etc he has said he will cut the cost.
@Franglais.
You really are scraping the barrel in your hate campaign towards Trump.
He makes a passing remark, with a seemingly pedantic error and you pick up on it like a tramp on a discarded pie.
To go back to my theme of comparison on this thread, with the political one, you ought to concentrate on numerical miscalculations closer to home, perhaps you should have a look at the fiasco on legs who is our own chancellor Rachel Reeves, she cant even calculate her own CV ffs.
Oh hang on,…I see on said political thread you are too busy currently implementing your other hate campaign on Nigel Farage.
As I keep saying The Litmus Test, …if both these individuals are annoying and generally.ing off the Lefties, that proves they are in fact doing a good job.
Btw…I notice you conveniently ignored my point (or chhallenge) about with you being so much of an epic political critique, that we are waiting for a list of errors, f_ups, lies and incompetence from our present govt, in the style you excelled yourself in when the Tories were in power.
Or in your view (or the official line which is invariably the same thing) perhaps you think they are doing a good job?
“A passing remark”? It was a full on speech.
He talked about reduction of 500%, 600%, 1,000% 1,500%.
It was no slip of the tongue nor any such. It is simply innumerate.
Why? If Reeves makes a mistake does that automatically mean that Trump is suddenly a mathematician?
That if someone else speaks nonsense, then Trump becomes sensible? What are you saying?
You really still do not understand how forums work do you.
If you want to tell us how bad the current Gov are why don’t you do so? Not delegate others to do so.
No matter how bad the current Gov are, they are better than the current alternatives.
Who says that? I certainly have never said so.
You are setting up a straw man argument. (Again)
Go on then…
Has Starmer lied to the Monarch? Have the Gov set up illegal ways for party donors to get Gov contracts? Has Starmer misled Parliament? Has the PM or his ministers gone on holiday during a crisis?
Classic Franglais post.
The pretence of not understanding the post for effect.
The pompous and sanctimonious manner, the denial of the obvious, the brainwash, the avoidance and cop out rather than adress the point…oh yeah and the obligatory list of Boris and his f.ups.
So he made a numerical faux pas…who tf cares?
Only you would (choose to ) interpret that way.
Oh he '‘does not understand’ …aye right, yawwwwwwn.
And there it is the sanctamonious pomposity, the ‘‘We know better than you lot’’ stance of the Left, along with the inability to admit when wrong, or apoligise, or even look at things from a different perspective…but maintain a closed mind.
I do..constantly, but not make a virtual hobby out of it as you did with the Tories.
You really can not bring yourself to admit what everybody can see, that this givt is a crock of sh …
You’re missing a trick here it would give you a chance to deny it and do your '‘Comical Ali’ routine.
Did Boris REALLY do all that?
Funny that you have never mentioned it before..
First time I’ve heard it.
So now you have given us the Boris list…what about your Starmer list?..oops sorry there I go again not understanding how a forum works…what am I like eh?
im seeing my friend thats a teaching assistant tonight, ill ask if franglais can sit in on his year 4 maths class when they do percentages.
no verbal faux pas its the same as the labour party do with the immigration stats or try to.
its the difference between a percentage change of a whole number and the increase difference or decrease in this case.
just typical leftie cobblers trying to make everyone else look as stupid as they are.
they did it with boris he said stay home they claimed they didnt understand so he expounded on it rather than just telling them more forcefully so they cried that he changed the narrative.
all the leftie idiots sat their crying about it while the sensible people cracked on with what they were told the first time.
Yeah course ya did…or was it more…
‘‘Went looking for another Trump quote’’
To reiterate as long as he annoys the Lefties…he’s like Guitar George… ‘‘He’s doin alright’’.
Just to clarify to Mr Cooper…I meant Trump made a numerical faux pas…not Franglais.
Franglais was the one to took the opportunity to blow it out of all proportion.
Ooh look.another liberal lefty outfit …salon.com has slso took umbrage…who’d a thought it.
Speaking of comparisons with the US and Trump, and UK and Starmer…have a listen to this and compare the attitudes…
It speaks for it s self a strong no nonsence leader compared to a wet wipe.
The Lefties may need their smelling salts when they hear this no nonsence rhetoric…be careful with those pearls.