Looking fairly certain that the bombers are Chechens, probably the most psychopathic and violent race on earth and the people behind the 2002 Moscow theatre siege.
Harry Monk:
Looking fairly certain that the bombers are Chechens, probably the most psychopathic and violent race on earth and the people behind the 2002 Moscow theatre siege.
and the school too
There is another gruesome photo of the lad in the wheelchair showing him just after the bomb had gone off with him laying on the floor. 
He’s apparently making good progress in hospital thankfully and was the key witness in identifying the description of one of the bombers.
Go to reddit and there is a picture of the dead older brother. Not for the faint hearted
Just like here the place seems to have lost the plot in relation to it’s immigration policy. 
By the way did anyone see the interview with the aunt.She was scary enough. 
Ah! Another case of “A tale of two terrorisms” and the warped rational that accompanies it. When the west kills indiscriminately it’s excused as “Humanitarian intervention”. When the perceived dangerous foreigner retaliates it’s “Terrorism”.
So what’s this classed as then?
Solly:
Ah! Another case of “A tale of two terrorisms” and the warped rational that accompanies it. When the west kills indiscriminately it’s excused as “Humanitarian intervention”. When the perceived dangerous foreigner retaliates it’s “Terrorism”.
So what’s this classed as then?
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.
Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.
Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
You seem to be missing the point as to why are we bothering with Afghan and Pakistan etc when the problem of terrorism in our own back yard is all about the continuing bonkers immigration policies of the western countries.If we don’t let the zb’s in and deport all those who are here,regardless of wether they were born here or not,they can’t get us.No doubt that idea would be called racist who cares if it’s good enough for the Israeli government then it’s good enough for us and no surprise you don’t see the IDF running around on a wild goose chase all over Afghan etc looking for ‘terrorists’ because they don’t need to.
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Navety would surely depend on where you are getting your information from?
If all you are doing is regurgitating what the Reuters, BBC or Murdoch’s “media” empire is giving you, then perhaps you should look again.
There’s a big game being played out here, and we’re the pieces.
A few keywords for you:
Divide and rule.
New world order.
Order out of chaos.
Problem reaction solution.
Totalitarian tiptoe.
Normalcy bias.
False flag.
Black bag.
Sheep dipped.
Patsy.
Do your own research. Believe it or not the mainstream media are corrupt and DO tell lies.
This has been shown time and again.
Drop the dead donkey it seems was more of an exposé than a comedy.
Goaty:
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Navety would surely depend on where you are getting your information from?
If all you are doing is regurgitating what the Reuters, BBC or Murdoch’s “media” empire is giving you, then perhaps you should look again.
There’s a big game being played out here, and we’re the pieces.
A few keywords for you:
Divide and rule.
New world order.
Order out of chaos.
Problem reaction solution.
Totalitarian tiptoe.
Normalcy bias.
False flag.
Black bag.
Sheep dipped.
Patsy.Do your own research. Believe it or not the mainstream media are corrupt and DO tell lies.
This has been shown time and again.
Drop the dead donkey it seems was more of an exposé than a comedy.
I’m not typing “troofer ■■■■” into google thank you, it’s just attention seeking crap from people who wish to find a conspiracy in every day events.
Please yself clever ■■■■■
You obviously live in European paradise where the powers that be are whiter than white and Jeremey Vine is a Crusader for " “Truf” as you dismissively put it. 
Goaty:
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Navety would surely depend on where you are getting your information from?
If all you are doing is regurgitating what the Reuters, BBC or Murdoch’s “media” empire is giving you, then perhaps you should look again.
There’s a big game being played out here, and we’re the pieces.
A few keywords for you:
Divide and rule.
New world order.
Order out of chaos.
Problem reaction solution.
Totalitarian tiptoe.
Normalcy bias.
False flag.
Black bag.
Sheep dipped.
Patsy.Do your own research. Believe it or not the mainstream media are corrupt and DO tell lies.
This has been shown time and again.
Drop the dead donkey it seems was more of an exposé than a comedy.
There are certainly some strange contradictory issues going on amongst the western governments.Including the bs idea that the world can all live together in integrated peace when nature put all the different ethnic groups and diferent cultures in different parts of the planet for a reason.Which is why I don’t want to emigrate to live in Asia or Africa etc and likewise I don’t want the government here inviting the people who I don’t want to live amongst,on their own turf,to come and live here on mine.Which is the basis of the problem,considering that none of the terrorist attacks,which have caused the aggravation between the western forces and so called ‘insurgents’ in Afghanistan etc,were caused by anyone who wasn’t invited into the places where they committed their attacks including the most recent one in Boston.
In view of the western governments’ obvious open door immigration policy,especially regarding alien hostile cultures,and the bs idea that anyone who disagrees with the obvious communist Tito type policy in the west,of inter ethnic integration,gets branded as ‘racist’,how does that fit the description of a so called policy of divide and rule.It’s more like the exact opposite,in being a policy of forced integration,in the interests of cheap labour for a few get rich quick people at the top,while sending the army out on a wild goose chase just to put on a show of supposedly ‘dealing’ with the symptoms.While at the same time making sure that they avoid the cause because they want to keep the cheap labour potential,provided by the open door immigration policy,going.
Carryfast:
Goaty:
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Navety would surely depend on where you are getting your information from?
If all you are doing is regurgitating what the Reuters, BBC or Murdoch’s “media” empire is giving you, then perhaps you should look again.
There’s a big game being played out here, and we’re the pieces.
A few keywords for you:
Divide and rule.
New world order.
Order out of chaos.
Problem reaction solution.
Totalitarian tiptoe.
Normalcy bias.
False flag.
Black bag.
Sheep dipped.
Patsy.Do your own research. Believe it or not the mainstream media are corrupt and DO tell lies.
This has been shown time and again.
Drop the dead donkey it seems was more of an exposé than a comedy.There are certainly some strange contradictory issues going on amongst the western governments.Including the bs idea that the world can all live together in integrated peace when nature put all the different ethnic groups and diferent cultures in different parts of the planet for a reason.Which is why I don’t want to emigrate to live in Asia or Africa etc and likewise I don’t want the government here inviting the people who I don’t want to live amongst,on their own turf,to come and live here on mine.Which is the basis of the problem,considering that none of the terrorist attacks,which have caused the aggravation between the western forces and so called ‘insurgents’ in Afghanistan etc,were caused by anyone who wasn’t invited into the places where they committed their attacks including the most recent one in Boston.
In view of the western governments’ obvious open door immigration policy,especially regarding alien hostile cultures,and the bs idea that anyone who disagrees with the obvious communist Tito type policy in the west,of inter ethnic integration,gets branded as ‘racist’,how does that fit the description of a so called policy of divide and rule.It’s more like the exact opposite,in being a policy of forced integration,in the interests of cheap labour for a few get rich quick people at the top,while sending the army out on a wild goose chase just to put on a show of supposedly ‘dealing’ with the symptoms.While at the same time making sure that they avoid the cause because they want to keep the cheap labour potential,provided by the open door immigration policy,going.
Your drivel policy is still in full swing i see
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Jesus H Christoph, man. The Afghani & Pakistani rebels are mountain tribesmen. They don’t have the ultra high-tech military equipment that the UK/US possess. Ah! fekit. So you are still of the opinion that the UK/US can bomb the crap out of them with all their high-tech equipment and claim it is “Humanitarian Intervention”. They do the same with “Blue Peter” devices and it’s “Terrorism”? They are both the same, atrocious acts. They can’t honestly be considered as different.
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Jesus H Christoph, man. The Afghani & Pakistani rebels are mountain tribesmen. They don’t have the ultra high-tech military equipment that the UK/US possess. Ah! fekit. So you are still of the opinion that the UK/US can bomb the crap out of them with all their high-tech equipment and claim it is “Humanitarian Intervention”. They do the same with “Blue Peter” devices and it’s “Terrorism”? They are both the same, atrocious acts. They can’t honestly be considered as different.
WTF are you on about? re-read the post, then re read it again and for good measure read it a third time.
You will then notice that “Humanitarian Intervention” and “Terrorism” where never mentioned by me in anyway shape or form. You will also note that i stated and for the purpose of paraphrasing correctly
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.
in regards to your posting of dead children. Looking even close into that sentence you will see these words.
unfortunately it’s not unique to either side
Spacemonkeypg:
WTF are you on about? re-read the post, then re read it again and for good measure read it a third time.
I suggest you do as you suggest.
I asked why one bombing act is considered “Humanitarian Intervention”, the other “Terrorism”? But you refuse to answer. Probably because you don’t have a clue as to the answer. In which case I refer you to Goaty’s comments for help…
Very straightforward really.
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
WTF are you on about? re-read the post, then re read it again and for good measure read it a third time.I suggest you do as you suggest.
I asked why one bombing act is considered “Humanitarian Intervention”, the other “Terrorism”? But you refuse to answer. Probably because you don’t have a clue as to the answer. In which case I refer you to Goaty’s comments for help…Very straightforward really.
Because you are the person who wishes to see fit to place those labels onto these incidents. You have made claim those names in this thread “Humanitarian Intervention” and “Terrorism”
Next time don’t attempt to make out that people are saying something completely different than what they are. When the clear written evidence is above, you will look less stupid.
Spacemonkeypg:
Carryfast:
Goaty:
Spacemonkeypg:
Solly:
Spacemonkeypg:
Collateral damage, unfortunately it’s not unique to either side.Oh that “Old chestnut”.
Well it is unique to one side, as I haven’t seen any reports of the Afghani/Pakistani rebels having drones never mind deploying them.
So again I ask, Was that particular heinous attack an act of “Humanitarian Intervention” or “Terrorism”?
Anyway BFN.Drones no, Blue Peter devices that blow themselves up hell yeah.
Do not attempt in any way to suggest that Afghanistan and Pakistani rebels are selective in there attacks, unless of course that is what you truly believe and are indeed very very naive.
Navety would surely depend on where you are getting your information from?
If all you are doing is regurgitating what the Reuters, BBC or Murdoch’s “media” empire is giving you, then perhaps you should look again.
There’s a big game being played out here, and we’re the pieces.
A few keywords for you:
Divide and rule.
New world order.
Order out of chaos.
Problem reaction solution.
Totalitarian tiptoe.
Normalcy bias.
False flag.
Black bag.
Sheep dipped.
Patsy.Do your own research. Believe it or not the mainstream media are corrupt and DO tell lies.
This has been shown time and again.
Drop the dead donkey it seems was more of an exposé than a comedy.There are certainly some strange contradictory issues going on amongst the western governments.Including the bs idea that the world can all live together in integrated peace when nature put all the different ethnic groups and diferent cultures in different parts of the planet for a reason.Which is why I don’t want to emigrate to live in Asia or Africa etc and likewise I don’t want the government here inviting the people who I don’t want to live amongst,on their own turf,to come and live here on mine.Which is the basis of the problem,considering that none of the terrorist attacks,which have caused the aggravation between the western forces and so called ‘insurgents’ in Afghanistan etc,were caused by anyone who wasn’t invited into the places where they committed their attacks including the most recent one in Boston.
In view of the western governments’ obvious open door immigration policy,especially regarding alien hostile cultures,and the bs idea that anyone who disagrees with the obvious communist Tito type policy in the west,of inter ethnic integration,gets branded as ‘racist’,how does that fit the description of a so called policy of divide and rule.It’s more like the exact opposite,in being a policy of forced integration,in the interests of cheap labour for a few get rich quick people at the top,while sending the army out on a wild goose chase just to put on a show of supposedly ‘dealing’ with the symptoms.While at the same time making sure that they avoid the cause because they want to keep the cheap labour potential,provided by the open door immigration policy,going.
Your drivel policy is still in full swing i see
Drivel really.So maybe you can explain how wiping out every single ‘insurgent’ in Afghanistan,assuming that you can find the zb’s and work out who the insurgents are as opposed to all the ‘others’,would have stopped the Boston bombings or the London bombings and those who carried them out.
As opposed to my idea in which case they never would have been allowed to stay in the countries in question to carry them out.