Be careful what you keep on those in-cab laptops

[davepenn54]

waddy640:

davepenn54:

Sir +:

Steve-o:
Animal. He’ll get what’s coming to him in jail.

I so hope you’re right.

It’s very unlikley that this beast will suffer any kind of retribution whilst in jail Unless Prison Officers make him vulnerable to attack by other ‘non - segregated’ inmates

Anyone convicted of this type of vile crime can immediatey apply to the Governor of the prison for protection under Rule 45 (Personal Protection), this is usually done by people who have been convicted of a range of unacceptable crimes, not just unacceptable to John & Jane public, but also unacceptable to the criminal fraternity they might have to spend the next 3 - 5 yrs , or longer being incarcerated with

The usual system for a ‘seg’ wing is to block it off from the rest of the prison and whenever the inmate’s of that wing are moving about the rest of the prison is on ‘lockdown’. When high profile offenders have been attacked whilst in custody there usually has been some inside help to facilitate the attack.

This evil beast will more than likely pass his jail time ‘networking’ with other perverts and building contacts for the future and I’m sure he will be a danger to children and will offend again when he is eventually released

■■■ offenders cannot be re-habiltated they have to be watched and monitored for the rest of there live’s and these beasts are not only Male there are a lot of Female ■■■ offenders out there who don’t seem to get the same publicity as men do.

Regards
Dave Penn;

It was changed to Rule 45 some years ago.

It is not a guarantee of total protection, as has been discovered by Ian Huntly and one or two other high profile cases recently.

It is also not unknown for those on protection to fight amongst themselves.

I’ve edited my post to reflect the change in Prison Service Orders: Rules on Segregation.

It is also not unknown for prisoners held on normal location to fight amongst themselves

My point was that the person in OP is very unlikely to be attacked whilst in prison because of the nature of his offence, he will be held in a unit that accomodates his peers ie; Other ■■■ offenders and paedophiles and they usually like to share their experiences and offending and if they do fight it is normally about property or baccy not about being a ■■■■■.

If for any reason he was attacked by a prisoner from normal location then collusion from prison staff would have to be forthcoming to allow that to happen. In the scheme of things he will be regarded as a low risk offender by staff however heinous we might view this scumbag pervert and I’ve yet to meet a Prison Officer who would put their career on the line for somebody like this, child ■■■■■■’s and child murderer’s now that is a different story

When you enter a prison you have to leave the ‘normal’ world behind there are a whole different set of rules and values that apply to staff and prisoners alike.

Like ‘crazytrucker’ I too went through a bad time after a very messy marriage breakup, lost everything and ended up homeless but before I got too far down into that very dark place I managed to get some help got back on my feet and into further education and ended up going to Leeds Uni; as a mature student and doing agency work at weekends and odd days. From 1990 to 1996 I worked as an education subcontractor to the Prison Service across three West Yorkshire prisons and even had my own office within HMP Leeds, so my post is based on my own personal experience of the ‘system’ and how it works or certainly how it used to work And I cannot see it having changed that much since I left as change was something the Prison Service found very hard to do.

Regards
Dave Penn;

[truckyboy]

Crazytrucker…you lost a battle but won the war…well done matey…i salute you…i would imagine that in the early part of your darkest days you must have felt like topping yourself…but as the record says…its all over now…so move on with your life and dont dwell on the past…although thats very easy for us to say…if i got to ipswich at anytime, your welcome to snap away…say hello to the ol mutt for me.

as for the ■■■■■ they say theres one on every corner…so no doubt weve all come across one in our time on the road...but words fail me when i read or hear about these scum...like many on here, when youve got children and grand children, and great grand children…its hard to comprehend what on earth goes through their heads to warrant even a thought of seing a child naked…i use to always carry a camera with me, and now because of these lowlife, and the human rights laws, i would be too scared to take a photo in case some one accused me, of course i would always take pictures of my kids, and [zb] the human rights, but when a parent cannot even take a photo of their kids in the school panto…then something is seriously wrong…after all, the head and teachers normally know what child belongs to which parent…but i guess thats what this country has come to…and its a great shame.

[woody2808]

Wheel Nut:

woody2808:
He’s done this before…doesn’t say much for the recruitment/hr department at Stobarts does it

At least you managed to get a knock at Stobart post in early mate, first page, well done.

Doesn’t say much for AF Blakemore or the driver agency they use either does it?

The Inland Revenue had a similar incident when one of their staff took pictures of kids using a teddy bear camera.

what do you want? Government ID cards with every offence and fine listed as well as all your debts and ■■■■■■ preferences on the database.

Wheel Nut, this wasn’t a specific dig at Stobarts. All the dealings I’ve had with them, their drivers etc. have all been positive so I have no reason whatsoever to slag them off and I would have said this about any company. This was a critisism of the human resources/recruitment procedure in general. I would have thought/hoped that there was a procedure in place which could flag up a serious offender such as this man and warn potential employers of his past because I, for one, don’t want to be sat eating my scran in a canteen somewhere sharing a table with a kiddy fiddler

[waddy640]

I believe a couple of ■■■ offenders appealed against being put on the ■■■ offenders register and won their case, on the grounds that it infringed “their” human rights. No account is taken of the rights of their victims.

Something that is not always apparent is that many of these offenders are very intelligent people and are more than capable of manipulating the system for their own ends.

[steve07]

i have what dirty little [zb] pigs need and ive just sharpened it, cut there nuts off and watch them bleed to death.

I know that this is an emotive subject mate, but putting what you did to dodge the auto censor isn’t allowed. dd

[crazytrucker]

truckyboy:
as for the ■■■■■ they say theres one on every corner…so no doubt weve all come across one in our time on the road...but words fail me when i read or hear about these scum...like many on here, when youve got children and grand children, and great grand children…its hard to comprehend what on earth goes through their heads to warrant even a thought of seing a child naked…i use to always carry a camera with me, and now because of these lowlife, and the human rights laws, i would be too scared to take a photo in case some one accused me, of course i would always take pictures of my kids, and [zb] the human rights, but when a parent cannot even take a photo of their kids in the school panto…then something is seriously wrong…after all, the head and teachers normally know what child belongs to which parent…but i guess thats what this country has come to…and its a great shame.

It seems Truckboy that we were brought up in a different age and time. I’m guessing you are a little older than me as I was in the 3rd year of secondary school in ‘63’, now that’s something isn’t it, Beatles, Stones etc, ladies knees and thighs were being seen for the first time , but then tights came along . You got to the stocking tops and you thought you’d had the full monty We were almost innocence itself in those days. You got a clout round the ear off a copper and went home and whinged about it you copped another one, because ‘you’ must have been up to something When I was a kid we had a ■■■■■■■■■■ bakers delivery man (though nobody used that word, just a dirty old man) who used to tempt us with cream buns Though we were told to stay away from him me and my mate would ■■■■■■ his buns and leg it But I don’t remember him being stoned in the street, or abused, not until much later did he go too far and cop for a prison sentence. However, by comparison to some of the evil scum walking the streets today I believe old Sid was a mild offender, because after he came out, so I’m told he was a changed character, and of course that was the in the days before computers etc.
I know there are some ‘dodgy’ photos of me kicking around somewhere, naked, in a tin washing up bowl on the lawn I was 18 months old Taken with a Box Brownie, very low tech spec and miles away so none of my magnificent tackle was on view But I remember seeing pictures of two of my girl cousins, they would have been 6 and 7 ish stood naked in the bath. They are in their fifties now so I should imagine that they must have destroyed them by now, those photos must have haunted them, but must have been a paedophiles ■■■■■■■■■. But those photos were taken in all innocence, just as those photos of me in the bath with my grandchildren were. I am like you Truckboy, I only take pictures of me and mine, and Trucks and dogs and dock cranes and ships… In short I have become a boring old ■■■■ and yes Truckboy that is the world we now live in, and it truly is a shame

And the reasons I can’t work is not just because of the panic attacks, but I have emphysema, (hang on I’ll check the dictionary ) why I can’t have a disease I can spell , chronic sciatica, and the 'old man’s disease) an enlarged prostate, where every pint I take in means 3/4 pees Whereas in my prime it would be 6/7 pints per pee And every so often have to have a camera stuck up my bell end to check for the ‘C’ word. It bloody hurts, is highly , the indignities we put up with just because of getting old I have heard blokes say, ‘no efin doctor is going to stick his fingers up my arse!’ Don’t be pillocks, go have the tests if in any doubt, there is already a thread on here about the outcome if you don’t, it’s, I believe, in the top 3 of mankillers!
The emphysema only manifested itself after I gave up smoking Now only have 37% lung capacity left (Being on boxes for the last few years didn’t help my smoking any, but the cab ban would have been too late for me!) Only told that this year. Sciatica and buggered up knees caused by years of gettin clattered on various football/rugby pitches and years of jumping/falling out of truck cabs Case of still having the mind of a 25 year old but the body of an ‘old git’
I really must get out more You’re right Steve-O I do seem to ramble, never use one word when I can use 20 Probably heading for senilty too

‘Crazytrucker’

[silver_surfer]

Well done crazy for coming back from the brink. We all go through hard times, some worse than others and it ain’t easy coming back from it, older & wiser as they say.

Paedo’s should be chemicaly castrated on the first offence. Not sure I’d go so far as the death penalty but wouldn’t kick up too much of a fuss if that were the case, support it more for that than murder to be honest. Just mistaken conviction would be the only point of doubt.

Taking a childs innocence is the worst crime in the world.

[oatcake1967]

Sorry to drag this disgusting topic up again folks but having read the article posted below I could not help but compare it to this thread.
I understand that details of offences commited are paramount in court cases but why is a professor given what amounts to a slap on the wrist.

A Newcastle University professor who admitted several of child ■■■■■■■■■■■ offences has avoided a prison sentence.

Police raided the home of Michael Kehoe at Old Byre, Morpeth, in April last year. They found more than 200 indecent images of children on his computer.

The leading professor in microbiology was given a three-year community order at Newcastle Crown Court earlier.

The 56-year old was also placed on the ■■■ offenders register for five years.

Investigators grade images of child ■■■■■■■■■■■ from 1 to 5 with grade 5 images regarded as the most serious and offensive.

Of the 232 images found on Kehoe’s computer, 22 were level four.

The images had been downloaded and then deleted over a 14-month period.

Kehoe worked at the university’s Institute of Cell and Molecular Biosciences but was suspended following his arrest.

‘Fully remorseful’

The court heard that he is one of the world’s leading experts in his field and his work has saved countless lives.

His wife of 29 years and colleagues from the academic world were in court.

At an earlier hearing at Newcastle Crown Court, Kehoe admitted four specimen charges of making indecent images of children.

Prosecutor Paul Rowland said: "Mr Kehoe was extremely candid with interviewing officers, extremely co-operative and accepted he had downloaded these images over a period of time.

“He was somewhat vague as to why he had downloaded them.”

The court heard that Kehoe was struggling to come to terms with the death of his mother at the time the offences were committed.

His brother was also seriously ill at the time and later died.

Judge Brian Forster QC said in court: "I accept that you are fully remorseful for your offending.

“I am quite satisfied that you acted out of character because of the pressure you came under at the time.”

Kehoe was also ordered to pay £1,200 prosecution costs.

Newcastle University has confirmed Kehoe will face disciplinary measures.

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/england/tyne/10299197.stm

[newmercman]

Just wtf has a dead mum or brother got to do with turning someone into a ■■■■■ ffs?

un[zb]ingbelievable oh &

This sentance was in a Crown Court, so it was a full on Judge, not some old biddy of a magistate, the world has gone mental.

The uni are going to put him through a disciplinary are they? Well, they should put the [zb] through a [zb]ing blender

[wheel_nut]

newmercman:
Just wtf has a dead mum or brother got to do with turning someone into a ■■■■■ ffs?

un[zb]ingbelievable oh &

This sentance was in a Crown Court, so it was a full on Judge, not some old biddy of a magistate, the world has gone mental.

The uni are going to put him through a disciplinary are they? Well, they should put the [zb] through a [zb]ing blender

Kehoe worked at the university’s Institute of Cell and Molecular Biosciences but was suspended following his arrest.

Should have suspended him by his knackers or his neck.