And If The UK Leaves Europe

Rjan:

trevHCS:

Rjan:
Like they already have done, frankly, after 9 years in power.

That’s the thing, so far ■■■ I know wee can bring in people from outside the EU anyway, its just we have to accept them from the EU no questions.

What questions would you ask them? Are you here to supply bosses who want to cut pay and conditions? Are you here to to backfill cuts to training and career paths?

The reality is that the vast majority of immigrants are not some foreign hoard of undesirables or loafers. They’re basically just decent, ordinary working people.

The problem is every time the bosses get their hand on a foreign doctor or nurse, that’s one less youth from the settled population (including the children of previous waves of immigration) they have to actually train and maintain to be a doctor or nurse.

Mass immigration is basically a scroungers charter for Western bosses. Every time they raze a middle-eastern society, and open the doors to “refugees”, that’s tens of thousands of experienced doctors, engineers, and scientists poached from those warzones.

We have to move the conversation on immigration away from the Tory and far-right narrative that the problem is of “controls” or of closer examination of the characters and contributions of immigrants. That’s all a complete red herring.

The real problem is of how bosses are using immigration to wage a class war, firstly against settled workers in the West, and secondly against poorer societies whose lifeblood and vitality they constantly drain through skills-creaming.

Rjan, spot on as usual.

Dolph:

trevHCS:

Rjan:
Like they already have done, frankly, after 9 years in power.

That’s the thing, so far ■■■ I know wee can bring in people from outside the EU anyway, its just we have to accept them from the EU no questions.

Don’t worry, all parties will want to ramp that. Cheap labour seems to be on all tjeir minds mostly as they are all run by very rich business people who look after their mates interests, ie: shareholders.

As fir panic about Indian labour mentioned earlier - think they are about 40 years behind and most of those people worked hard, bettered themselves and are much richer than me.

This is British government choice, try living on the continent without ID card(registration of some sort), job, health care contribution,place to live etc. UK Gov decided to open wide its doors for EE migrants, no one forced you to it. No one in UK required me to register where I live, no one asked me if I have job offer, no one asked me in NHS to see if I have made contribution payments, this open door policy is YOUR Government creation. Stop blaming EU for everything…

^^^^^^ this.

I arrived here on a short holiday break, and for various reasons ended up living here. Between running out of my savings and finding a job driving, I briefly applied for benefits. I obviously had a passport, but was living with friends (couch surfing), had no fixed abode, and obviously by that point never paid into the system. I got a NS number and card in a day, and my first giro three days later. You can live here without a fixed abode, and work or claim benefits, without anybody batting an eyelid. I have lived here as a homeowner, and without a fixed abode, for just about equal times. I’ve worked fulltime throughout, and paid NI and qualified for my State Pension. Even though half that time i was technically “homeless”…

I only renewed my passport 2 years ago too… :sunglasses:

These are the main reasons why so many people try to come here. Once you put a foot on the ground, you’re in…

Dolph:
This is British government choice, try living on the continent without ID card(registration of some sort), job, health care contribution,place to live etc. UK Gov decided to open wide its doors for EE migrants, no one forced you to it. No one in UK required me to register where I live, no one asked me if I have job offer, no one asked me in NHS to see if I have made contribution payments, this open door policy is YOUR Government creation. Stop blaming EU for everything…

If the EU isn’t trying to impose immigration policy on even non EU member states let alone members,then how do you explain this ?.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/ … dependence

euronews.com/2018/06/21/vise … -migration

Carryfast:

Rjan:

Mugabe doesn’t quack like a duck.But the Soviet Socialist contingent felt that he quacks well enough to associate him with Castro and call him Comrade Mugabe. :unamused: Yeah right.

To be honest, the CPGB-ML doesn’t strike me as an especially credible authority - it’s like quoting “Carryfast on Trucknet” as though the fact that he says it’s true means it must be true.

But Mugabe does quack an anti-imperialist line, and that puts him in good company with various other leaders like Castro who are undoubtedly anti-imperialist.

Even Stevie Wonder could see that so called ‘whites’ ( your words not mine ) face murder based on ( racist ) motives.

It wouldn’t surprise me if there were some such murders driven by an individual’s racial animosity, but I suspect more frequently it is driven by other reasons.

As opposed to so called ‘black on black’ murders although in that case tribal differences obviously often replace racism.IE the Zulu spear existed before the ‘whites’ arrived and therefore could only have been meant for chucking at their own.

How is a history of inter-tribal warfare any different for blacks than whites? Anyway, the vast majority of violence in Zimbabwe and South Africa is not from tribal armies, but from ordinary criminal violence.

As for ‘blacks’ working for a lower wage than their white bosses.Yes just like I worked for a much lower wage as a shop floor worker than a design engineer.IE the latter had the brains but I had no job,or in this case food to eat and civilisation which goes with the ethnic difference territory,without him. :unamused:

(Forgot to reply to this first time around!)

Well it’s fair to say that we allow a modestly larger wage to the design engineer because, at least in theory, his job involves additional demands.

But the difference between blacks and whites wasn’t brains, it was skin colour.

Many white immigrants were not even ambassadors of white civilisation - they were very often the sorts of people who were on low wages (in Britain) doing shop floor work, without any particular personal suitability to economic management or statecraft, and who were malcontents in British society.

Rjan:

Carryfast:

Rjan:

Mugabe doesn’t quack like a duck.But the Soviet Socialist contingent felt that he quacks well enough to associate him with Castro and call him Comrade Mugabe. :unamused: Yeah right.

To be honest, the CPGB-ML doesn’t strike me as an especially credible authority - it’s like quoting “Carryfast on Trucknet” as though the fact that he says it’s true means it must be true.

But Mugabe does quack an anti-imperialist line, and that puts him in good company with various other leaders like Castro who are undoubtedly anti-imperialist.

Even Stevie Wonder could see that so called ‘whites’ ( your words not mine ) face murder based on ( racist ) motives.

It wouldn’t surprise me if there were some such murders driven by an individual’s racial animosity, but I suspect more frequently it is driven by other reasons.

As opposed to so called ‘black on black’ murders although in that case tribal differences obviously often replace racism.IE the Zulu spear existed before the ‘whites’ arrived and therefore could only have been meant for chucking at their own.

How is a history of inter-tribal warfare any different for blacks than whites? Anyway, the vast majority of violence in Zimbabwe and South Africa is not from tribal armies, but from ordinary criminal violence.

As for ‘blacks’ working for a lower wage than their white bosses.Yes just like I worked for a much lower wage as a shop floor worker than a design engineer.IE the latter had the brains but I had no job,or in this case food to eat and civilisation which goes with the ethnic difference territory,without him. :unamused:

(Forgot to reply to this first time around!)

Well it’s fair to say that we allow a modestly larger wage to the design engineer because, at least in theory, his job involves additional demands.

But the difference between blacks and whites wasn’t brains, it was skin colour.

Many white immigrants were not even ambassadors of white civilisation - they were very often the sorts of people who were on low wages (in Britain) doing shop floor work, without any particular personal suitability to economic management or statecraft, and who were malcontents in British society.

It’s obvious that both ANC and ZANU PF were Soviet inspired and backed organisations.Both Mandela and Mugabe being enthusisatic supporters of that agenda

In ‘your’ typically simplistic view it’s all about skin colour.In ‘my’ view it’s a far more complicated issue regarding rates of ethnic European civilisation progression and technical know how even down to the lowest farm hand v those of ethnic African.Sorry if calling a spade a spade doesn’t fit your script in that regard.

Of which even at a cultural and societal level it’s obvious that apartheid ( self determination of the differing ethnic cultures ) was a necessary and ultimately good thing.Had it been allowed to flourish naturally along the lines of ordinary gravitation instead of throwing the baby out with the ( exaggerated ) racism bathwater.

So here we are with both SA and Rhodesia now basket cases compared with their ‘wrong colour rule’ past situation.In addition to reverse racist murders and mistreatment of the ethnic European population to the point where any of them with any sense will get out of the place.At which point both places revert back to the usual situation of what happens when Africans run Africa with no ethnic European involvement.But now added to by Communist China exploiting the place to the max instead of us and the Dutch building it.That’ll fix it.

On that note as I’ve said there isn’t much point in leaving the EU unless that means re setting the clock back to 1972.Which obviously includes foreign policy in addition to regarding Soviet Socialist ideology as the subversive,corrosive,malignant infiltrating agenda which it was generally rightly viewed as then.As opposed to comrade Corbyn strutting around as though he already has his place on the EUSSR politburo.

Carryfast:

Rjan:

It’s obvious that both ANC and ZANU PF were Soviet inspired and backed organisations.Both Mandela and Mugabe being enthusisatic supporters of that agenda

And my impression generally is that the Soviets were involved. But that doesn’t mean Mugabe and the like were communists (whether in the Soviet sense or otherwise).

In ‘your’ typically simplistic view it’s all about skin colour.In ‘my’ view it’s a far more complicated issue regarding rates of ethnic European civilisation progression and technical know how even down to the lowest farm hand v those of ethnic African.Sorry if calling a spade a spade doesn’t fit your script in that regard.

We can call a spade a spade and observe that apartheid policies ultimately razed Rhodesia to the ground and brought SA to the edge of it.

You argue that the white regime embodied civilisation, but in fact there has never been a system as egregiously exploitative as apartheid in Europe. The whites in Rhodesia did not come from such regimes. Regimes in Europe have been brought down for much less.

And the argument that whites brought progression is false, because the whites systematically tried to prevent blacks progressing. What the whites did was force their way in, get the blacks working for extremely low pay in order to service the needs of the developed world for food (and undercut farmers and agricultural workers based in the developed world), and tried to see to it that the blacks themselves would never rise above that station of subjugation and exploitation. Whatever it’s advantages, it’s disadvantages were clearly greater.

Of which even at a cultural and societal level it’s obvious that apartheid ( self determination of the differing ethnic cultures ) was a necessary and ultimately good thing.Had it been allowed to flourish naturally along the lines of ordinary gravitation instead of throwing the baby out with the ( exaggerated ) racism bathwater.

The races couldn’t flourish separately because the whites needed the blacks’ labour.

So here we are with both SA and Rhodesia now basket cases compared with their ‘wrong colour rule’ past situation.

Basket cases for whom? Previously the blacks were on their arses, now they are presidents.

You may argue that the majority of the blacks face worse crime rates, for example, but that is on account of whites fighting a revolutionary war to prevent equal civil rights, and malign elites frequently will impose social destruction to try and maintain their position, and the only thing you can do is guarantee them social destruction - and see if they will compromise, or do indeed have to be purged.

In addition to reverse racist murders and mistreatment of the ethnic European population to the point where any of them with any sense will get out of the place.At which point both places revert back to the usual situation of what happens when Africans run Africa with no ethnic European involvement.But now added to by Communist China exploiting the place to the max instead of us and the Dutch building it.That’ll fix it.

Perhaps there’s a lesson to be learned then, which is that if you want to build civilisation in Africa, you’ll have to work with blacks, not enslave them.

If whites want to work with blacks, they will have to accept black wages and share their “know how”, or else the blacks will just prefer to develop themselves autonomously (as whites originally did).

Rjan:
Perhaps there’s a lesson to be learned then, which is that if you want to build civilisation in Africa, you’ll have to work with blacks, not enslave them.

If whites want to work with blacks, they will have to accept black wages and share their “know how”, or else the blacks will just prefer to develop themselves autonomously (as whites originally did).

:open_mouth:

So know you’re saying that Smith’s regime was actually a slave state.Which part of,low grade jobs by definition mean low grade pay regardless of the skin colour of the employee,didn’t you understand. :unamused:

As I said it’s clear who the real racists are here and it wasn’t people like Ian Smith.Indigenous Africans develop themselves autonomously.Yeah right that’ll work.Just like it has so far throughout the rest of Africa.

Australia or Canada wouldn’t exactly have been the places they are now had it been left to the indigenous populations either.On that note we don’t refer to Aborigines or American Indians v the European colonists by their respective skin colour.So why are you so bleedin hung up about the white v black thing in Africa.

Carryfast:

Rjan:

:open_mouth:

So know you’re saying that Smith’s regime was actually a slave state.Which part of,low grade jobs by definition mean low grade pay regardless of the skin colour of the employee,didn’t you understand. :unamused:

I’m not sure I understand any of your argument here!

As I said it’s clear who the real racists are here and it wasn’t people like Ian Smith.Indigenous Africans develop themselves autonomously.Yeah right that’ll work.Just like it has so far throughout the rest of Africa.

We’ll have to see. Europeans didn’t exactly achieve it in a decade - France is famously on its 5th Republic, and Germany I suppose you would say is on its 4th Reich, and even England had to decapitate a head-of-state gone mad.

At any rate, it isn’t for whites to decide to hurry the process up, as you seem to see it, by trying to install themselves as an enriched elite.

Australia or Canada wouldn’t exactly have been the places they are now had it been left to the indigenous populations either.On that note we don’t refer to Aborigines or American Indians v the European colonists by their respective skin colour.So why are you so bleedin hung up about the white v black thing in Africa.

I’m not hung up on whites v blacks - it’s simply the topic we’re discussing.

And to be clear, I’m not rejecting the economic development of Africa. I’m simply insisting that it has to be done with a measure of cooperation and consent.

The Australian Aborigines and the Native Americans differ from the African blacks in that they are small minorities of whom no great economic use was made during the formation of those nations.

That is the great contradiction of white supremacy as any sort of engine for spreading civilisation (as we know it in the West), which is that whites mostly have succeeded in inducting blacks into the capitalist mode of production and employing them extensively, but weren’t willing to allow that to continue to develop so far as it meant that some blacks would have to be allowed to rise up the chain of economic management in African nations, whereas some whites in Africa would have to fall to the very bottom to labour on the same terms and with the same status as blacks (which, in a highly unequal society, could mean falling very far indeed).

Even in America, the slavery question was resolved in favour of free labour and equal civil rights a century before Smith was grappling with the problem in Rhodesia. At the same time as Smith, attempts especially in the American South to continue to subjugate blacks via back-door methods and illegal terror were also met with a renewed eruption of anger and resistance. Unlike all other societies facing these problems, Smith’s regime doubled down and then folded as a result.