el_presidente:
There is an obligation to report (injuries) where another vehicle was involved. Simple.[…]
Remove the ‘my’ - it is the presence of the other MPV which is key. Remove the assumption that simply because the other MPV has not been damaged/the occupants not injured, that it is not also an ‘accident’ vehicle. It is. The presence of that other MPV has caused me to sustain injury. If they have not reported it, I must report.
I’m afraid I don’t see which part of the Act imposes that requirement. It is true, briefly stated, that a two vehicle accident involving one injury is always reportable by somebody.
That somebody is the non-injured driver (he being the only driver involved in an accident involving someone’s elses loss). The injured driver, in this case, is not involved in an accident involving anyone else’s loss.
The quirk in the law here is that the non-injured driver (if his involvement only comes about due to his parked, unattended car) may not even be aware that an accident has occurred, so he is not in practice going to report something he knows nothing of. In that case he appears to commit the offence technically, but of course he wouldn’t suffer any penalty (assuming he was correctly parked and not at fault for the accident).