Acorn:
Being a professional driver usually means they do the job well and always legit. In a short period of time over a short couple of sections of roads, they picked up on a bunch of non-professional drivers, sometimes called cowboys. Most of the offences related to the driver either solely the driver or driver & employer.
So, why would professional drivers object at trying to raise the standards of the cowboys or is it far more acceptable to encourage and support the cowboys undermining the professional ones?
On the bright side, think how many vehicles / drivers they encountered and didn’t find a reason to stop them.
It’s well known on here afaik that I ain’t the Police’s biggest fan, not so much the front line guys but the ones in charge, their methods, their selective and pc policing, and the easy target strategy/pr to make it look like they are a success…when in fact on the face of it they are NOT.
The majority of the stuff they do is to do with handing out an easy option crime number, along with revenue raising fines…so that clarifies my attitude towards them in one.
As for this particular case,.I roughly interpreted it at around 40 real road safety offences, 14%? out of their announced 280, with the majority of the cases being a revenue raising success from their pov.
As a pro driver I am all for getting inept useless and dangerous drivers off the roads, and unscrupulous operators, but I still ain’t convinced this type of tactic and operation is entirely the main aim or agenda…nor do I believe the haulage industry is still rife with cowboy operators as much as it once was.
Truck crime in overnight parking would be a far more worthwhile use of resources, not catching some twonk too stupid to wear his seatbelt so that they can relieve him of a few quid.
Spot checks? Not a problem if they too are for genuine reasons, but not for nicking you for unstrapped cardboard and the like.
So no, I do not support the cowboys, but neither am I convinced about Police motives or agenda either…but that’s just me.