Carryfast:
As it stands I’m seeing nothing there which isn’t consistent with a >14’ high vehicle hitting a 4.2m clearance bridge.
It’s reasonable to assume that the bridge arch width markings are less than 3m call it around 2.8m and the 1.5x possibly even less that vehicle height checks out by actual measurement not by eye.
The truth is if there isn’t safe clearance for 4.3m then there also isn’t safe clearance for 14’.At face value the drivers positioning and confidence suggests that he knew his height and what he was doing.I’d be more than surprised if he took a 14’ > vehicle under that bridge.
If only the operator could post here as to the actual height of that wagon to give us a final verdict.
Mixing metric and imperial…again…and again…
If the operator did post here I daresay someone(?) who didn`t like what they posted, would argue that /their measurement was wrong/they were trying to malign the driver/the bridge was wrongly marked/etc/etc/…