You obviously have to be sensible with defects, what exactly stops you from running, and marker lights are just small fry…
But I don’t really see how mentioning the fault at the end of the shift helps us as a whole, especially when it’s a corporate firm where the attitude can often be ‘someone else’s problem’. The admin want your paperwork and that’s it! They are not the next driver in the truck and as such you can’t be that surprised if they do sweet FA about the issue, be it a marker light or something else… However, if management have had to start the paper trail of passing crap back up the chain, their perception of the issue may be a little better.
Diplomacy therefore may be the answer to resolving defects. And as I don’t have any, I just find it nice and simple to note a defect, and say “your call boss”, sign here and we crack on, or give me another truck…
As for defects out on the road, say I was on a night trunk and a headlight bulb blew. Possibly as I’d not really done my checks properly and ensured I had a spare. I’d note where and when it blew, why I couldn’t replace it, and crack on. Not ideal, but as long as you’ve still got a side light to outline your size, you’re probably only on big roads, I don’t see it as a major deal. Refusing to shift until recovery comes, now that’s a different matter!
Yes you can argue that denying knowledge of a defect makes you less culpable, but isn’t there also a trade off against competency? And when you do get a tug, how good are you at blagging stuff, as I’m crap! So I guess I go the other route of doing everything by the book and use my common sense to decide what stops me rolling.
All Newbies go through a learning curve of what the crack is with defects, who does what, and what is, or isn’t serious. I’ve driven trucks with defects that possibly I shouldn’t. I didn’t enjoy doing class 1 mult-drop without any reversing lights, as the office and fitter both told me they weren’t a defect, as they are not an MOT failure. A Newbie does what at this point? Do they google it, or just crack on? As the answer isn’t quite black and white from what I can tell. As I understand it, a vehicle doesn’t have to have them, but if they are there, they should work. So do you end up arguing semantics of how the law is interpreted, with someone who does the firms MOT’s? Probably not if you’re a Newbie, but the fact still remains that you’re the one who has to then spend the day dealing with the general public unable to indicate to them WTF you’re trying to do… So my thinking is this, OK it’s not an MOT failure, just sign that here and we are good to go mate! As that’s the only real pressure you can put on management to sort it out without throwing toys, all in an effort to make your life easier tomorrow.
And as if by magic, i got a better trailer!
Sorry if another limper got the old one, but that’s his issue now, and if he’s prepared to put up with the dross, more fool him. He’s not exactly helping the cause if you’re all in it together at a firm with a ‘them and us’ blame and accountability focused culture. And if he thinks the firm will repay his flexibility when the crap hits the fan, he’s going to be sadly mistaken…
You cover your own arse, as no one is going to do it for you, especially the firm!
Whether you/I can do that without being an arse about it, who knows…