ramone:
Buzzer:
There’s nothing wrong with a 32 hour week this is the 21st Century not the 19th and taxes don’t fund wages.However this is the same muppet who wants to stay in the EU single ( Free ) labour market and allow the free movement of Capital around Europe and all subject to free competition laws.What could possibly go wrong.So we end up swamped with more East Euro labour while at the same time what industry we have left moves to cheaper parts of Europe.Pardon me but did they not they try a 38hr week in France and that never worked out either and they all want to retire at 55 too so is that where our 250mil a week goes to fund EU ideas like this because of course they have the right.
Wasn’t the WTD supposed to keep working hours down but then they invented POA because they realised it was totally unworkable and clashed with tacho laws ffs, who can live off £320 gross a week , tax the rich and they move out. 32 hours a week would no doubt be over 7 days on shifts no thanks even if i could afford to.
[/quote]
Why are you applying such a blinkered view of the potential shift patterns to meet that.As opposed to a 3 or 4 day week and employ more people.Labour supply goes down wages then increase.
Brit working class wanting the maximum hours possible done by the fewest possible workers are the definition of turkeys voting for Christmas.On that note prepare for a Labour government if that’s the best that you have to offer.Bearing in mind that Brexit is now all over bar the shouting and unless the military want to take on parliament.