Dr Damon:
Carryfast:
What we do know is that computers can’t outperform humans when it comes to the fine inputs needed to take off or land a plane in anything more than perfect calm conditions and usually more aggro than its worth in most other cases.So what makes the nerds think that they’d be any better in driving anything.Oh wait maybe that explains why the only robot trains are limited to the DLR and we’re seeing ever increasing reductions and dumbing down of the road speed regime because they know that the robots won’t be able to handle anything going much faster than a crawl on the ground.Let alone the knife edged 3 d aspects of flying a plane in anything much more than a totally straight line at height where there’s enough room to correct its zb ups.Although even then unless it’s the Air France 447 type of example.Oh yes they can. You are living in the dark ages fella.
Really.So why aren’t we already seeing auto take off/land being used routinely in the case of aircraft and driver less trains used on the majority of,if not all,rail operations and autonomous ships ?.Let alone autonomous road vehicles.
Also seems strange why the establishment suddenly sees autonomous trucks and cars as good but human controlled ones as nasty juggernauts and a danger to the planet that should be taken off the road.IE if it looks and sounds like a bunch of control freak office nerds,who want to remove the enjoyment of driving for those who like it and/or are just jealous of the job of a driver then it probably is.On that note,as I’ve said,I doubt if freedom of choice in all this is part of their agenda.Which will answer that question once and for all. 