Franglais:
Carryfast:
tachograph:
I just regret that we don’t have politicians capable of, or willing to, carry out the wishes of the electorateFirstly the EU referendum Act was deliberately drafted as a non binding document which makes the decision reached moot.
While realistically this was always an issue which required the Head of State to assert her authority over parliament,concerning a matter of defence of the realm and national sovereignty/security by way of the Royal Perogative and ultimate command of the forces as part of that to arrest a parliament gone rogue.
The obvious questions being why in the case of the former and why not in the case of the latter.
Are you arguing that the fact Brexit hasn’t happened yet, is because the Queen hasn’t done her job properly?
She should already have ordered Parliament to carry out the wishes of the people, or arrested them?Who should be accused of treason in this case?
Mrs Teresa May?
Mrs Betty Windsor?
No I’m arguing that firstly she didn’t do her job ‘properly’ in failing to order the forces to arrest/impeach Heath for treason against the state which would have nipped the whole thing in the bud.The fact that she also didn’t stand in the way of the Single European Act,nor Maastricht,nor Lisbon just adds to the questions over her leadership or in fact who is actually pulling her strings.Dark forces indeed.While as it stands yes ultimately it’s all about the question of why the lack of leadership at Sovereign Head of State level in this obviously being a matter of the handover of sovereignty.Not much point in having a ‘head of state’ if she’s going to stand by and allow the ‘state’ in question to be handed over to a foreign power in the form of the EU Federation and government.