Moon landing denier

Freight Dog:

dowahdiddyman:
ok, can somebody explain why so many of the photos from the moonhave been proved fake, IE, crosshairs infront of pictures of the astronauts,.

The cross hairs appearing to disappear behind things was cleared up. The image is blown out. The light overexposed, blowing out the image giving the appearance the cross hair is edited.

The lunar surface is comprised of uneven and very reflective particles. The lighting you see on the astronaut in the shadow of the spacecraft is the highly effective back lighting from the surface. Back lighting and light bounce is effectively used in film making and photography.

If you were an observer on the moon watching the astronaut climb the steps (or getting down) he wouldn’t be immersed in pitch black, you’d be able to see him. In the same fashion the camera exposure was able to pick him up due to the bright light reflected back onto his also -reflective space suit.

Shadows don’t follow the same lines on an angular surface as they do on a flat surface.

You might find this interesting.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=syVP6zDZN7I