Carryfast:
Rhodesia being a more legitimate African state than the PC renamed Zimbabwe in my eyes.Which includes the ‘racist’ view that ethnic Europeans could run Africa and farm Africa better than the indigenous African population could/can.
They couldn’t run Africa though, could they, without alienating the majority and triggering a wave of bloody civil wars and revolutions in every single country? And with the whites having spent years throwing blacks out of windows or injecting them with paralytics and throwing them out of helicopters into the sea, wonder why the “war veterans” aren’t too concerned about shooting them and confiscating their property.
The reason South Africa is still in one piece is because the whites (some of whom in South Africa had been settled in the country for centuries, unlike Rhodesia where most had only been there a decade or two) finally got the message that there was nowhere else to fall back to, put their sense of entitlement aside, and jettisoned apartheid - which they could have done, peacefully, in the first place.
The fact that whites are still the better farmers is to be expected, because they are better educated and more experienced, but the idea that you expect as a white person to live like a class of royalty forever more has thankfully been dislodged. The mentality of entitlement, based on the colour of your skin, has gone.